On Mon, 15 May 2017 16:14:23 +0000 Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, your helpful person was, indeed, helpful, giving you correct > information: ZWJ sequences are not _characters_ and have no > implications for ISO/IEC 10646. Except in so far as the claimed ligature changes the meaning of the ligated elements. For example, using <'a', ZWJ, 'e'> for an a-umlaut that was clearly not a-diaeresis would probably be on the edge of what is permissible. Returning to the example, shouldn't 1F468 200D 1F680 mean 'male rocket maker'? Richard.
