Good point, thanks Mark
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 22:34:12 -0800 > Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > > The ZWJ Virama sequence is already provided for by the combination of > > GB9 & GB9c. But not the ZWNJ. If we want to handle that, it would > > mean the addition of something like: > > > > GB9d: × (ZWNJ ViramaExtend* Virama) > > I don't think we need ViramaExtend* here. The seqeunce should be > followed by a base consonant, so there's no way for another mark to > sneak in. > > Incidentally, I think ViramaExtend would be better named as NSExtend, > with 'NS' for 'non-starter'. > > Richard. > >