On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:31 PM Shriramana Sharma via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> > On 23-Jan-2018 10:03, "James Kass via Unicode" <unicode@unicode.org> > wrote: > > (bottle, east, skier, crucial, cherry) > s'i's'a, s'yg'ys, s'an'g'ys'y, s'es'u's'i, s'i'i'e > sxixsxa, sxygxys, sxanxgxysxy, sxesxuxsxi, sxixixe > s̈ïs̈a, s̈yg̈ys, s̈an̈g̈ys̈y, s̈es̈üs̈i, s̈ïïe > śíśa, śyǵys, śańǵyśy, śeśúśi, śííe > > [...] > > I retract my earlier statement about digraphs probably being the best > option. It was made without looking at the actual requirement. For such > heavy usage, it would simply make things horrible. > I'd say that the words chosen for this discussion have been specifically chosen for their heavy usage. Wikipedia has a translation of "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.", in what I believe in the new apostrophe-laden orthography: Barlyq adamdar tu'masynan azat ja'ne qadyr-qasi'eti men quqtary ten' bolyp du'ni'ege keledi. Adamdarg'a aqyl-parasat, ar-ojdan berilgen, sondyqtan olar bir-birimen tu'ystyq, bau'yrmaldyq qarym-qatynas jasau'lary ti'is. It's not that bad, though apostrophes still aren't a orthographic win. I'm voting for the Uniform Turkic Alphabet, for the grand total of zero my vote is worth.
