> +1 if the font has all the glyphs in the range should be
> +1 if the font has all the glyphs needed for the range
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage David Starner via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverag... Leonardo Boiko via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverag... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Norbert Lindenberg via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverag... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverag... Bobby de Vos via Unicode
- Re: metric for block cov... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for bloc... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- AW: metric for block cov... Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode
- Re: metric for bloc... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- AW: metric for ... Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode
- RE: metric for block coverage Peter Constable via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Frédéric Grosshans via Unicode
