I'm more interested in what areas you found unclear, because wherever you did I'm sure many others would as well. You can reply off-list if you want.
Mark Mark On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Janusz S. Bień <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks to all who answered. The answers are very clear, but the original > message and the adoption page are in my opinion much less clear. I can > however live with it :-) > > Best regards > > Janusz > > On Wed, Feb 28 2018 at 11:53 +0100, [email protected] writes: > > Also, please click through from the announcement to > http://www.unicode.org/consortium/adopt-a-character.html. > > > > If it isn't apparent from that page what the relationship is, we have > some work to do... > > > > Mark > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Martin J. Dürst via Unicode < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2018/02/28 19:38, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 27 2018 at 13:45 -0800, [email protected] writes: > > > > The 157 new Emoji are now available for adoption, to help the Unicode > > Consortium’s work on digitally disadvantaged languages. > > > > I'm quite curious what it the relation between the new emojis and the > > digitally disadvantages languages. I see none. > > > > I think this was mentioned before on this list, in particular by Mark: > > The money collected from character adoptions (where emoji are a > prominent target) is (mostly?) used to support work on not-yet-encoded > (thus digitally > > disadvantaged) scripts. See e.g. the recent announcement at > http://blog.unicode.org/2018/02/adopt-character-grant-to- > support-three.html. > > > > -- > , > Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra > Lingwistyki Formalnej) > Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department) > [email protected], [email protected], http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~ > jsbien/ >
