Yes and it explains clearly that “effectively caseless Georgian” is incorrect. Georgian has case. Georgian uses case differently from other scripts. This is an orthographic distinction, not a structural one. In fact as it is also stated in the proposal, there are 19th-century texts which do titlecase. It’s just that that orthography is no longer in use and that behaviour no longer desirable.
Michael Everson > On 27 Jul 2018, at 05:54, James Kass via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > Alexey Ostrovsky wrote, > >> "The Georgian community understood" — sorry, but >> here "the Georgian community" means a small group >> of Georgian font designers who promote upper-case >> for effectively caseless Georgian. > > https://unicode.org/wg2/docs/n4712-georgian.pdf > > The revised proposal to change the Georgian encoding model from > caseless to casing was convincing and compelling. (It's bilingual, > too, English and Georgian.) >
