On Thu, Aug 23 2018 at 11:49 -0700, beckie...@gmail.com writes: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Janusz S. Bień <jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > > > I already provide this myself for my uses of the PUA as well as the > > CSUR and any vendor-specific agreements I can find: > > > > http://www.kreativekorp.com/charset/PUADATA/ > > I would prefer to see the data in a repository, so others can can > comment and contribute. > > That is actually my intent for the future. Though it's not quite ready yet: > > https://github.com/kreativekorp/charset/tree/master/puadata
Great! > > That's the data in a "pre-compiled" form; it's turned into a "proper" > PUADATA directory using this script: > > https://github.com/kreativekorp/charset/blob/master/bin/build-public.py > > As for "any vendor-specific agreements", do MUFI and LINCUA qualify? > > I certainly do want to see MUFI and LINCUA provided in this form, but > I put them in a different category along with CSUR. I basically have > three categories of PUA agreements: > > Fonts - PUA assignments specific to a font family, e.g. Constructium, > Fairfax, Nishiki-teki, Quivira, Junicode, etc. You are probably aware that Junicode 1.000, released in September 2017, supports in full MUFI 4.0 (released in December 2015). I don't know whether Junicode contains now any PUA characters which are not in MUFI. > > Public - PUA agreements meant to be widely used, e.g. CSUR, UCSUR, > MUFI, LINCUA, etc. > > Vendors - PUA assignments meant to be used by a single vendor or > platform, e.g. Adobe, Apple, etc. but also Linux, MirOS, etc. > > Thank you for those links by the way. I had tried to find charts for > MUFI in the past but had somehow been unsuccessful. Similar files for different purpose has been created by Mikkel Eide Eriksen: https://github.com/mikkelee/mufi-latex An earlier version of MUFI was incorporated in the ENRICH Gaiji bank: http://v2.manuscriptorium.com/apps/gbank/ You can download the source but it doesn't seem useful. A version of MUFI is available also as a searchable character database created by the present single-person MUFI board, i.e. Tarrin Wills, as a part of the beta version of a new MUFI site: http://skaldic.abdn.ac.uk/m.php?p=mufi Some time ago I wrote on the mufi-fonts list: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Sun, Dec 03 2017 at 6:55 +0100, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl writes: [...] > I wanted the file quickly to get an overview of the recently released > corpus of 16th century Polish, and it's seemed to me that the simplest > and fastest way is to convert the PDF recommendation in a semi-automatic > way. It was more cumbersome than I expected, but thanks to this approach > I've discovered a typo in the recommendation: letter I instead of digit > 1 in EAFI, the code for LATIN ENLARGED LETTER SMALL LIGATURE AE (p. 93 > in the code chart order version). > > For the planned extension of the program I need more info on MUFI > characters, preferably in the format of the UnicodeData.txt. This time > however I intend to make haste slowly, so I have a question: > > Is it possible to make publicly available for download the database > underlying http://skaldic.abdn.ac.uk/db.php?if=mufi&table=mufi_char? --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Unfortunately I got no answer to the question. > > Of course there is no way to get software to use this information. > > What kind of software do you have in mind? > > Unicode-related utilities, text editors to start with. You pretty much > hit the nail on the head with uniname and emacs as examples. :) Thanks! As for uniname by Bill Poser, I exchanged mails with him in 2011: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Sun, Aug 28 2011 at 12:01 +0200, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl writes: [...] > A student of mine wrote an alternative program according to my > specification. The program is GPLed and available with > > git clone http://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~findepi/unihistext unihistext Now https://bitbucket.org/jsbien/unihistext > > The source is ready for Debian packaging. > > I think the program is worth better distribution, but its author is no > longer interested in it. Would you be so kind to consider including > either the program itself in your uniutils or extend your unidesc with > its features? > > Best regards > > Janusz On Sun, Aug 28 2011 at 16:03 -0700, billpos...@gmail.com writes: > In principle, sure. I'll have a look at it. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Unfortunatelly nothing happened, and I thought I should not press the point. Best regards Janusz -- , Janusz S. Bien emeryt (emeritus) https://sites.google.com/view/jsbien
