On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:58 PM Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > *If* the VS is ignored by searches, as apparently it should be and some > have reported that it is, then VS-type solutions would NOT be a problem > when it comes to searches
Who is using VS-type solutions? I could not enter except for manually using some sort of \u notations. Languages that need special input support can easily adapt to unusual rules, but English Unicode is weirdly hard to enter, because the QWERTY keyboard is ubiquitous and standard. Smart quotes, non-HYPHEN-MINUS hyphens and dashes, and accents generally need memorizing of obscure entry methods or resort to a character list. Without great support from vendors, a new Unicode italic system only going to be used by the same people who currently use mathematical italics. > (and don't go whining about legacy software. > If Unicode had to be backward-compatible with everything we wouldn't > have gone beyond ASCII). Then where's this plain text that absolutely needs italics? Those legacy software systems are the place where unadorned plain text still lives. Anything on the Web is inherently dealing with rich text. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.