On 1/16/2019 7:38 PM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:
Computer text tradition aside, nobody seems to offer any legitimate reason why such information isn't worthy of being preservable in plain-text. Perhaps there isn't one. By introducing state, even localized, you are creating a de-fact0 "rich-text" protocol - unless you duplicate all code points in italics, what you create is 'not so plain' text. VS's and similar efforts are pseud0-encoding are already in a gray zone, but at least for VSs there's an established protocol how to ignore presentation issues in processing. Much of the discussion of 'plain text' here is very focused on presentation and does not adequately consider the harm done to the text-processing model that underlies Unicode. That's all I'm prepared to contribute for a bit. A./ |
- Re: Encoding italic David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missing lin... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missin... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last mi... Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last missin... Victor Gaultney via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last mi... Andrew Cunningham via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... Victor Gaultney via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last mi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Martin J . Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Martin J . Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Encoding itali... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A... Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (w... Victor Gaultney via Unicode
- Re: Encoding itali... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding itali... James Kass via Unicode