On Tue 17 Dec, 2019, 16:09 QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode, <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Agree. > By the way, it is common practice to use multiple nbsp in a row to > create a larger span. In my opinion, it is wrong to replace fixed > width spaces with non-breaking spaces. > Quote from Microsoft Typography Character design standards: > «The no-break space is not the same character as the figure space. The > figure space is not a character defined in most computer system's > current code pages. In some fonts this character's width has been > defined as equal to the figure width. This is an incorrect usage of > the character no-break space.» > Sorry but I don't understand how this addresses the issue I raised.
