At 06:40 PM 12/12/2001 -0600, Federico Balbi wrote:
>How difficult would it be to implement the (ternary?) "? :" operator in
>Unicon? It could be pretty handy in some situations, especially for C
>lovers :-)
I'd rather not acquire it. C has ? : because if...then is a language
construct, not an operator. As Clint mentioned, Icon's if...then already
works where C programmers must descend to ? :.
Wade Bowmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
