On Thursday 20 June 2002 9:50 pm, Rev. Shamim Mohamed D.D. wrote: > > Can someone (Robert or Shamim?) please supply a corresponding > > patch for read(), to go with Robert's fix for reads()? I guess > > sock_getstrg() can return EOF before a read() completes, yes? > > I'm looking at it.... However, I don't see that sock_getstrg() can > return EOF before a read() completes. Since sock_getstrg() attempts to > read a line from the socket, seems to me that this fix is only > required for reads() and not for read() -- the former keeps reading > lines until it has enough. > > Robert, do you agree? > > -s
I think that's right. Certainly my patch was to the reads() function itself, not to the sock_getstrg() function. As far as I can see, read() on an internet socket seems to work okay, unless someone has noticed a problem with it? Cheers R ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
