My experience (Re: [Unicon-group] Hmmm, bug, feature, or operatoridiocy?)

[Art Eschenlauer]

My experience with Unicon has been that, while function names are 
full-fledged (Un)icon values, method names are not. This makes sense, in 
a way, since a class has no existence till you instantiate it (I am 
rationalizing after the fact here . . .).

Steve Wampler wrote:

(Note that any non-call reference of a method name produces
similar errors:  replacing the 'add("help", help)' line
with just:
  f := help

generates an error, even if f isn't dereferenced elsewhere.)

 





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group