On 2/10/06, Wendell Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:33:06PM -0800, Rev. Shamim Mohamed, D.D., LFHCfS, 
> Ph.D. wrote:

> > In any case, the select code in iconx really needs going over -- any 
> > volunteers?
>
> Oops.  Did I just volunteer?

Sounded like it!

That "wacky ri language" is RTL, the Icon Runtime Implementation
Language. It's basically C code with a few extra annotations (mostly
declarations) that allow the Icon compiler to do the type and liveness
analysis it needs to do. It's documented in an IPL -- I don't know the
number, but a search on www.cs.arizona.edu/icon should find it.

There are a lot of ugly ifdefs all over the code for Windows vs Unix
versions. The right way would be to separate the OS dependencies in
some abstraction, and just one ifdef at the top to pick the right
implementation.

-s
--
"If you don't live it, it won't come out of your horn. They teach you
there's a boundary line to music. But, man, there's no boundary line
to art."


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to