> Sidney Reilley II <[email protected]> skribis:
>
> Existing Icon versions don't interface well with today's many
> libraries and applications, or it might be more popular. Python OTOH
> interfaces happily and already with practically everything -- for
> instance, of interest to a font guy like me, both FontForge and
> FontLab. (I use the former.)
>

I would rather say that (Un)Icon doesn't appear to integrate well because 
nobody has put in the effort. Given that Perls, Pythons, PHP's etc are newer 
than Unicon, and were developed in an environment that is heavily influenced 
by the World of the Wide Web, it follows that their authors put effort into 
that kind of coding project.

Nothing stops Icon from being just as good except for the lack of 
comprehensive collection of APIs for other technologies. I look at the CPAN 
code repository in Perl and think "wow! how did it get so much code so fast?" 
I almost never fail to find a Perl package that does at least 1/2 of a new 
task I need to write.

I'm learning Python because it's available to program my mobile phone (Nokia 
E71 on Symbian) and I'm already feeling the lack of libraries. It seems that 
using Perl for many projects in the last several years has made me lazy; I 
expect someone else to have made a useful library and I get cranky when I 
can't find one!

We as a community could do worse than picking subsets from CPAN and rewriting 
them....



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to