> Also, note that Unicon already supports CE(a,b,c) style activation (as
> the example program I gave shows), which is equivalent to [a,b,c...@ce.
> Again, you have to write your co-expression knowing that it's getting
> a list of values, but that's not too hard.
>
Interesting - I'll have a play with that in the context. I'm not fussed about
how scrappy a Lambda function would have to be, but the place where the
anonymous code block goes - ie on the create or { } - should avoid noise just
to get it started.
If I come up with something really sussinct I'll share. I wonder if $define
could be exploited to hide the noise?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
