Hi Bruce,

I will gently reiterate that I would prefer that you ask such questions via 
private e-mail (or unicon-ldif), since they are not about the language and not 
of general interest.

We haven't moved the Icon grammar anytime in the last 2+ decades.  The Icon 
grammar has lived in h/grammar.h for at least that long. Careful reading of 
include files and makefiles would probably conclude that it is organized this 
way so that iconc's and icont's parsers, generated from the same grammar, can 
build different parse trees using different semantic actions. There is probably 
an opportunity to simplify and cleanup this code; I would be happy if we 
actually were a .y file and did not have any weird utility programs involved in 
parser construction other than YACC or Bison. But at present, it is just as 
Ralph left it.

Cheers,
Clint
________________________________________
From: Bruce & Breeanna Rennie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:05 AM
To: Unicon group
Subject: [Unicon-group] Simple question relating to tgram.y

For Clinton and Jafar,

I am having a look at the icont source and there appears to be no
grammar.y file for the icon base language any more. Did this disappear
many solars ago and is no longer required or is this just no longer
distributed?

regards

Bruce Rennie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to