I seem to have bumped into a vicious circle with threads. I want to "parallelize" a generator procedure producing a VARYING number of results every call, in a sequence that is NOT important.
>From the docs I understand that the usual method would be: every [(GEN) do] put(L1,thread put(L2,gen())) with GEN preferably generating the exact number of (varying) iterations as any call of gen() would produce in results. The obvious solution would be to lose the "(GEN) do" but then only ONE THREAD GETS CREATED ! Placing the gen() call in the "(GEN) do" part, would invalidate the whole parallelization gain. Thanks in advance for your suggestions, Bob. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
