Good morning to all this lovely day,
Reading the various responses to Clinton's original message on [unicon
-C ==> -fs tweak], gives rise to a question.
How many people actively use the iconc over iconx?
Since I started using Icon back in 1986, I have never come across a
situation where I have ever used iconc. As a matter of course, I always
use iconx. If the program is too slow, I rewrite it to speed it up,
change the algorithm, change the data structures, etc.
What sort of programs do people write that necessitate the use of iconc?
I note that one of the advantages of iconc is the type inferencing that
is used, what would it take to include this in the unicon compiler itself?
regards
Bruce Rennie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
