On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:12:55PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Adam Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Following up on this, it seems to me like keeping the Ruby 2.2.2 > > requirement is the right way to go for rack. If the unicorn project > > wants to continue support for older rubies, the unicorn gemspec should > > be changed to limit the rack dependency to '< 2'. If rack 2.0.0 is > > released and there is no limit on the dependency in unicorn's gemspec, > > it seems to me like any deployments that are not running Ruby 2.2.2 > > will fail. > > I prefer we drop the rack dependency entirely. We don't use rack > for much. This seems doable, (totally untested) patch below:
[snip] Ah, that was a much smaller patch than I had anticipated! :D -- Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/
