Hi James, > Sure. I attached my starting patch to BZ656 > https://bugzilla.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/attachment.cgi?id=246
I saw bug #656, but perhaps I misunderstood — does this second patch fix the issue you reported? I am currently exploring overlayfs, since it seems like it will be eventually accepted into mainline, so not sure at the moment when / if I will get to testing your port of Unionfs to kernel 3.4. If you or anyone else on the list is interested: https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git;a=patch;h=refs/heads/overlayfs.v13;hp=36be50515fe2aef61533b516fa2576a2c7fe7664 The downloaded git-am patchset can be converted into a proper patch with: sed -i '/^diff --git /,/^-- /{/^-- /d; b}; d' SHA-256 of resulting proper patch: ef579f695095c18d5c327e06ffd8d34f43d1cc05f7e56478af2446fae190a6dd -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
