On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:11:10PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got unionfs running on a slightly different environment. I modified the
> firmware of my Motorola A780 phone (runs linux) to use unionfs with a
> TransFlash 256MB card serving as the writable filesystem. Now the phone
> is completely customizable.
Cool!
> Curiously, if I mount the same unionfs at a later stage, after these
> applications are running, they run fine (although the files they need to
> open at a later stage are now in unionfs.
So are the applications running off of the unionfs?
I haven't been closely following development, but perhaps unionfs is
pinning much more memory. If the executables are demand-loaded via
mmap, it might be due to shortcomings in the current mmap support. Have you
compared /proc/{slabinfo,meminfo} for the two scenarios?
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
