FYI, This was applied on October 20.
Charles
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:50 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Shaya Potter:
> > I don't believe that's the problem here.
> >
> > try this.
>
> I see.
> This patch will help you, if it is true that a dir just after mkdir is
> always empty (even when some entries exist under same named dir on ro
> branch).
> This patch will stop checking lower priority branches when higher one is
> marked as opaque.
>
>
> Junjiro Okajima
>
> --- unionfs-20050929-0844/dirhelper.cO 2005-09-29 21:44:03.000000000
> +0900
> +++ unionfs-20050929-0844/dirhelper.c 2005-10-06 16:34:33.000000000 +0900
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
> struct super_block *sb;
> struct file *hidden_file;
> struct unionfs_rdutil_callback *buf = NULL;
> - int bindex, bstart, bend;
> + int bindex, bstart, bend, bopaque;
>
> print_entry_location();
>
> @@ -182,6 +182,9 @@
>
> bstart = dbstart(dentry);
> bend = dbend(dentry);
> + bopaque = dbopaque(dentry);
> + if (0 <= bopaque && bopaque < bend)
> + bend = bopaque;
>
> buf = KMALLOC(sizeof(struct unionfs_rdutil_callback), GFP_UNIONFS);
> if (!buf) {
> _______________________________________________
> unionfs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
