On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 00:39 -0500, Shaya Potter wrote: > I think without mmap support, this code is fairly useless if you run > programs, as it can't track usage by mmap. I disagree. It may not prevent you from removing a branch that hosts a currently executing file, but it still prevents you from removing a branch that has a regularly opened file (which is going to be more common).
Even if you can remove the branch that shouldn't be too much of a problem, because the the mmaping is actually established between the lower-level file system and the process. So removing the branch shouldn't really have much of an effect. > I bring this up, as I've been trying to debug problems with it for the > past few days. Is it really worthwhile to keep because of the mmap > problem? :) Charles _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
