Il giorno gio, 01/12/2005 alle 21.33 +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto: > >> >> Is this a known issue and is there a solution or workaround by any > >> >> chance?
> > Right. The first thing is, if expanded, a serious pivoting I could not > understand as long as I had it in the inbox. It was a privately sent one, > so there is no record in the archives. > I think it was like this solution > http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2005-October/001305.html > the unexplainable part being the > pivot_root /ram/union /ram/union i remember i met Jürg Billeter in the chan #unionfs, he is using run_init as me, i don't know if this can be the reason, and if that issue is not present using pivot_root and moving /proc, but for sure it exists using our way to change root. As initramfs and klibc run_init seem that will substitute initrd and pivot_root i think it would be nice to figure out a solution for this. why for ex /proc/1/exe is a link to /real/path/to/sbin/init and /proc/1/root is a link to unionfs root [/]? If this issue affects debian's start-stop-daemon, then it could be a really big problem for the stability of a livecd debian based, unionfs allows to install new packages, and some of them will probably fail running postinst scripts. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
