> > Finally unionfs does not return ETXTBSY and truncates the running
> > executable file illegally.
>
> sorry, the patch is wrong.
> I will post again later.
here it is.
----------------------------------------
From: Tomas M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:::
> I thought that persistent inodes are already implemented for many
> months, am I wrong?
I thought people are still working on it.
Junjiro Okajima
--- inode.c 26 Nov 2005 06:56:37 -0000 1.1
+++ inode.c 7 Dec 2005 16:12:05 -0000
@@ -919,8 +920,14 @@ static int unionfs_permission(struct ino
if (err)
goto out;
/* only the leftmost file matters. */
- if (is_file)
+ if (is_file) {
+ if (mask & MAY_WRITE) {
+ err = get_write_access(hidden_inode);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+ }
break;
+ }
}
out:
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
