Wilhelm Meier: > Thanks for the patch, I'll try it asap. And if it works, it meets my actual > requirements.
This patch does not solve your problem. It will need more modification in inode operations, if you keep unionfs nested. eg. unionfs both on nfs server and client. For example, - /unionfs = /rw + /ro - /ro/dir exists - /rw/dir does not exist When you 'touch /unionfs/dir/file', unionfs will lookup /ro/dir/.wh.file in unionfs_create(). > But, what do you think about the other option to define a filesystem-id, > which Unfortunately, I could not understand your idea and could not get the ideal behaviour of unionfs. Junjiro Okajima _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
