On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:05:01PM +0100, Torsten Luettgert wrote: > Hi, > > first of all, congratulations on the stability of the december 20051220 > snapshot! I couldn't get it to Oops yet, and that didn't happen since > 1.0.11 :-P > I'm really glad that unionfs stability is improving.
So are we :-) > I did see one curious thing in the log, though: > > Dec 22 17:50:10 scaramouche kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. > Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... Just stand back and enjoy the show ;-) Seriously tho, that shouldn't be a problem. Sounds like a refcounting issue. Junjiro Okajima made a bunch of patches a while back, which I'll hopefully get to apply sometime this week. So stay tuned for (hopefully) even better snapshot of Unionfs. Jeff. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
