On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:58:59PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Unionfs persistent inode number feature is a very good idea and very > important, especially very effective in these cases. > - link(2) on nfs branch. > someone posted this problem recently, about "pwd.lock". > - rmdir(2) failure. > - shrink dcache. > it happens anytime. > > But it is a little buggy. > I have tried addressing it, and will post my patches. > > First problem, the validation of the specifiend file doesn't > work. Currently users will not meet this problem if the multiple files > are specified.
All three patches applied. Thanks. Jeff. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
