On Saturday 28 January 2006 11:09, Erez Zadok wrote: > Before this discussion degenerates into a licensing flame war, check out > the COPYING file that's distributed as part of the fistgen package > (www.filesystems.org). Summary:
That's a hoot. I'd just been thinking that this has been the most civil,
relaxed licensing "debate" that I've ever observed.
> - our Unionfs for Linux is GPL (if we ever did one for Solaris, it won't be
> GPL, but something that's more compatible with Solaris and/or Open
> Solaris).
If I understand this, then:
a) Solaris porters would either have to write a license compatibility
layer,
as has been suggested, or
b) The UnionFS developers would have to change the license so that it
were a
dual-license, to accommodate the porters.
Is that accurate? I mean, FIST is loosely licensed enough, but the trick
comes in the UnionFS layer?
--
--- SER
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents,
more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some
great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach
their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." - H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
pgpB0BEo55j8c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
