On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:04 -0500, Shaya Potter wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 15:47 -0500, Erez Zadok wrote: > > Are you sure it's against 1.1.3? If so, why did you reintroduce fist.h? > > Make sure your "before" and "after" source trees are clean of old cruft. > > updated patch
btw, it passes all the regression tests I'm able to run (the regression tests in general aren't Debian friendly). But that also makes sense, as I'm not touching the real guts of unionfs. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
