"Kenneth Duda": > There is no need to call get_write_access with unionfs because you are > already calling it indirectly, in commonfops.c:
I don't think so. Unionfs needs to call get_write_access somewhere else. Please check this out and try the test case described in it. http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2005-December/001499.html Applying your patch, the problem will occur again. > But again, I am a newcomer to kernel hacking, so please don't regard > my analysis as definitive. Your analysis is very helpful, thanks. Junjiro Okajima _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
