Josef, I think Pete confused you with his message. Pete was merely pointing out that it is legal in UNIX to have a directory with a 0 link count. He is correct. In his example, the directory inode has a 0 link count because no file system object points to it. The reason the directory inode still exists is because his shell's working directory is holding a reference. You can then "ls" the directory because ls inherits this dead directory as cwd from the shell, and then "ls" can stat it as ".". This is all expected and has nothing to do with unionfs in any case.
I believe that Junjiro's patch fixes the real unionfs issue here, and that there are no further problems. Thanks for applying it. -Ken On 4/28/06, Hans-Peter Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 02:35 schrieb Josef Sipek: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > 15:55 linux01:~ > md xx > > 15:55 linux01:~ > cd xx > > 15:55 linux01:~/xx > rd ../xx > > What's `rd`? alias rd='rmdir' Historically found in SuSEs /etc/profile, some of us, who get used to it migrated that into /etc/profile.local on newer distributions.. Pete _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
_______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
