Hi, On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:24:20AM -0400, Josef Sipek wrote: > Unionfs 1.2 has just been released. This release includes a number of fixes, > and a lot of code cleanup. As we have promised earlier, this release is for > 2.6.16 kernels only. > > Starting with this release, the version number will consist of only a major > and a minor number. A minor release will be made for every kernel version. > The "stable" series of kernels (those with 4 version numbers, e.g., > 2.6.16.20) should not change any interfaces that Unionfs relies on and > therefore the release intended for the original version of the base kernel > should still work (e.g., 2.6.16). If for whatever reason a release for such > kernel is necessary, it will have a third version number. > > The table below summarizes the scheme. > > Unionfs Kernel > ------- ------ > 1.2 2.6.16 & 2.6.16.n > 1.3 2.6.17 & 2.6.17.n > 1.3.1 2.6.17.18 (in case that this version broke Unionfs build) > 1.4 2.6.18 & 2.6.18.n
This table somewhat confuses me. ;-) Apart from me maybe being confused too easily, is there, from your experience, any unionfs snapshot yet that works (in the sense of "not crashing very quick") with 2.6.17-rc* (since 2.6.17 isn't out yet) compiled with SMP support <- note this part ? Of course, as the maintainer of SLAX already said, it is entirely my fault of insisting in using SMP. :-) Regards -Klaus Knopper _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
