Hello,
I was on the phone with Jeff on Friday for an hour discussing Unionfs bugs and we came up with a prioritized list of 10 bugs which need to be fixed right away. I will be trying to use unionfs with something related to pam_namespace in the next few weeks so I will be working on unionfs bugs while at work probably this week and next. I think either by OLS or in the few weeks afterwards we should have quite a few bugs fixed. Using Unionfs for this wasn't my Idea but rather my boss's and he is willing to put his influence behind upstreaming Unionfs when things get taken care of. So I will be spending 8 hours a day for the next couple of weeks working on bugs. Now the better question is do you want these submitted as my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address still or should I put my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address so when we submit this for upstream inclusion it weighs a bit heavier?

Dave

On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Erez Zadok wrote:

How are we doing w/ the smp fixes to unionfs?  I've not seen any related
commits to that in a while.  "Bigger" projects require focused, dedicated
time -- you can't finish them a few minutes here and there, but you have to
give them solid chunks of time, like several 8-hour days straight, not doing
much else.

Erez.
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to