>> >cd /unionfs/union1
>> 
>> This sounds awkward. Making a pseudofs (spelled with 'e') that lives 
>> between the parent vfsmount and the union vfsmount sounds like it breaks 
>> all logical rules.
>
>I am not sure I'm following.

Never mind, I did not think of /unionfs as the pseudofs, but rather as the 
final mount.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to