On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:23:01AM -0600, Aaron Tygart wrote: > On 1/23/07, Josef Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Indeed. You have three choices: > > > >1) If you want to use this kernel version with the latest snapshot, you'll > >have to undo the removal of vfs_listxattr from unionfs. You can grab the > >function out of the kernel [1] and put it in xattr.c and a coresponding > >prototype in the .h file. > > > >2) You can try newer kernel > > > >3) You can try older unionfs snapshot > > > > Can you recommend a snapshot? The lookup table on unionfs.org still > states 2.6.19 series should use 1.5 snapshots. Shouldn't the newer > snapshots be bumped to 1.6 to go along with your previously defined > system (and to avoid confusion)?
I wanted to release a 2.6.19 compatible version for some time now. Hopefully, it won't be long. Josef "Jeff" Sipek. -- I already backed up the box once, I can do it again. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
