Not yet. But we will don't worry :) 2015-11-13 11:14 GMT+01:00 Prasad Somwanshi <[email protected]>: > Anybody got chance to look in to this ? > > > > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 at 12:48 PM > From: "Andrea Azzarone" <[email protected]> > To: "Prasad Somwanshi" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], "Marco Trevisan" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Unity-dev] Bug #1154364 > I ll take a look on Tuesday. Thanks > > On 6 Nov 2015 11:19 am, "Prasad Somwanshi" <[email protected]> wrote:I > realized that, it need to contributed with a branch. Do I need to do it ? Or > shall do it after initial feedback. > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 at 11:16 PM > From: "Prasad Somwanshi" <[email protected][[email protected]]> > To: "Marco Trevisan" > <[email protected][[email protected]]> > Cc: [email protected][[email protected]] > Subject: Re: [Unity-dev] Bug #1154364 > Find attached patch for this fix. Let me know what you think about it.My > feeling is , it could do with initial time out value of between 250 ms and > 500 ms. So that a meaningful query can be formed, before actually searching > it. Haven't touched SearchBar::ForceLiveSearch. > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 at 2:44 PM > From: "Marco Trevisan" > <[email protected][[email protected]]> > To: "Prasad Somwanshi" <[email protected][[email protected]]>, > [email protected][[email protected]] > Subject: Re: [Unity-dev] Bug #1154364 > Il 04/11/2015 15:38, Prasad Somwanshi ha scritto: >> Marco, >> >> Right now, there is pause of 40 ms , which is reset after each keystroke. To >> check is user is still typing in. >> My suggestion is a bit different. >> Depending on no of characters in search box, it should wait decresing no of >> ms before doing actual search. >> >> If user presses 'P', it's single character, so wait for 500 ms(or 250 ms), >> and there are more chances of use typing in more characters. >> Then user presses 'r'. We have 2 characters.(then wait for 250 ms(or 125 >> ms). Keep on reducing wait time as no of characters grows, and keep existing >> 40 ms as floor . >> So user may be able to do actual search 'prasad', without having to do >> search 'p' or 'pr' or 'pra'. >> So it will avoid effect of displaying result for non intended search words. > > The idea it's not bad... > Maybe 500ms as starting point is too much, as sometimes I'd just want to > type "f", firefox spots and I hit enter, but we could indeed increase > this wait so that it's slower and then gets quicker. > > If you want to contribute with a branch, it would be cool to review it. > > Thanks > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev[https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev] > Post to : [email protected][[email protected]] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev[https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev][https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev[https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev]] > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp[https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp][https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp[https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp]] > > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev[https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev] > Post to : [email protected][[email protected]] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev[https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev] > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp[https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp]
-- Andrea Azzarone http://launchpad.net/~andyrock http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AndreaAzzarone -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
