It's a pretty safe bet that L & I did place a lien. It would have been
the routine thing for them to do after an abatement action like that. I
doubt the owner would care; otherwise, he would have responded to the
violations and probable fines that preceded the abatement.
In a message dated 5/28/02 3:34:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I agree, I found that situation to be an example of what the city doesn't
do
after it has already cited a property for being unsafe. The real issue is to
why L&I didn't put a lien on the property and sell it at a sheriff sale, they
are owed $10K.
An absent home owner is just that. Is the argument that maybe they would've
responded better if they had HD fines (if they exist) and aggravation on top
of the L&I fines?
>>
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
