Hey John, I really don't care. I don't employee these people. Their employers may care however. My comments were specific to the e-mail addresses not the signatures. Corporations have published guidelines about the use of company logos, stationary and e-mail domains for liability reasons.
Again. Denial. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Ellingsworth Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:07 PM To: UC Subject: [UC] re: Spam S. The UC list has specific suggestions on interpreting signatures (of course you can interpret it as you see fit): "This list is mostly composed of individuals. Unless someone specifically states to the contrary, you should assume that they are expressing their own opinion and not the opinion of any organization to which they happen to belong or are employed by. In particular, many peoples email clients add a text signature at the bottom without it being particularly remarkable to the person sending the mail. You probably shouldn't interpret that signature to suggest official communication by their organization." Thanks, John Ellingsworth Project Leader Virtual Curriculum http://ellingsworth.org/john/ PGP Public Keyring: http://ellingsworth.org/pubring.pkr ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
