On 3/23/04 10:13 AM, "Brian Siano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Richard Hotchkiss wrote:
> 
>> I don�t see how the Penn program �forces� anyone out, if anything it
>> is a windfall to those longtime owners who now decide to sell. Without
>> the incentive program and the Alexander School, I don�t think the
>> prices of houses would have increased by up to 6 fold (in some cases)
>> over the past five years. I also think the area would have continued
>> to slide in the other direction as it had been since the late 70�s
>> until the Penn incentive began.
>> 
>> And if you really want to know what taxation is all about, check out
>> what suburbanites pay and what services they don�t get (limits on
>> trash pick up etc.). Many areas also get hit with a school tax on top
>> of their property taxes and income taxes.
>> 
>> Another good thing about raising property values is more equity for
>> loans so that one may reinvest in their property or themselves.
> 
> That's fine as far as homeowners are concerned. Yes, property owners can
> now draw on greater equity for improvements, and this applies to
> investment-property owners as well. But when landlords use this greater
> equity to improve their properties, it generally leads to an increase in
> the going rental costs of neighborhoods. And that's where the impact is
> hardest and most immediate: among renters.
> 
> I know several people who couldn't keep up with the rent increases that
> have happened over the past six years, and who've had to move further
> west and south. I'm sure than many of us know people who've been through
> this as well. In general, I think the Penn plan's helped the area, but
> let's not ignore this considerable and very real downside.
> 
> There are a lot of evils involved with the historic-designation
> proposal, of course.
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> 

I also believe that rentals have increased because the rents in center city
have gone through the roof and there are a lot more college aged students
then there were in the mid 80's. Supply and demand. But I think the
landlords could address this better

-- 
Richard Hotchkiss
http://www.hotstrings-inc.com
215 382 8706


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to