Not exactly.  If he ranked posters by length of message, a different "quantity" measure, I have no doubt that a woman would come in first or second place, even if a bunch of male windbags were right behind.  And I'm sure in other months, a number of women yakked themselves into the top 10.
  What is most noteworthy to me about these stats is the unusual number of days when the volume was kept in low numbers.  I thank all of you top 10 people for making that possible.   Keep up the good work.


In a message dated 5/24/04 11:01:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Isn't the Gender Spin on the postings interesting?
Is it possible that none of us woman posters made it to the top 10?

I guess we strive for quality, not quantity.
:-)

Liz

On Mon, 24 May 2004 09:46:15 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The archives at _www.purple.com_ (http://www.purple.com)� have� been
> fixed,


________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.


Reply via email to