Don't
worry about it -- I am sure that everybody assumed that you were all wacked out
on pills when you wrote it (you lucky bastard!).
Jonathan A.
Cass
-----Original Message-----Sunzoo you are vindicated, it wasn't a joke.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Pete Coyle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Up against fanaticism; a response
FX, I stand by my critique of the essay, but feel kinda rude about my wording. Sorry about that, I genuinely thought it was a joke posting. I probably thought that because the list is so liberal. No hard feelings.
I can't wait to accidently offend my next list subscriber, I'm on a roll.
Pete
On Thursday, May 27, 2004, at 01:59 PM, FX Winkler wrote:
The article was real, but posted to provide an alternative viewpoint to the mostly liberal views posted on this listserve.<image.tiff>
Pete Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just reread my post, and realized that I slammed Sunzoo more than I
intended. I meant to say that people sound stupid when they are angry,
but I think it sounded like "Sunzoo is stupid and angry" sorry about
that.
I assumed the article was real, but posted as a joke. My own political
bias is probably clouding my judgment.
Pete
On Monday, May 24, 2004, at 11:16 AM, sunzoo wrote:
> No illicit substances were consumed during this post.
>
> ru sure that was a joke? Looks like it was pulled verbatim from a
> fReeper site..
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 07:51:02 -0400 (BST), Pete Coyle
> wrote:
>>
>> I couldn't agree more. Sunzoo comes across as a Rush Limbaugh caliber
>> spokesman, to angry to not sound stupid.
>>
>> I assumed the original article was posted as a joke. It's as if a
>> teenage
>> born again christian wrote it. The Crusades bit was classic, I
>> laughed my ass
>> off.
>>
>> Winkler next time you find a funny post you should send it over to
>> culture.
>>
>> @#%*ing Pete
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
