I forgot to add, !(*@)(!*@()*!@)* !!!!   (Drool drool drool)  

On Fri, 28 May 2004 10:18:08 -0400, Pete Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Sunzoo,
>         You don't appear to be stupid, or angry. Now you are the lying liar!
> Pete
> 
> On Friday, May 28, 2004, at 09:48 AM, sunzoo wrote:
> 
> > PS, I didn't call Berg's captor's "noble".   You really ought to read
> > more closely.
> >
> > We don't know for sure that Berg was alive when the decapitation took
> > place.  There is credible speculation that Berg was killed in a more
> > conventional manner, then beheaded for the camera.
> >
> > I guess I've lost the thread of what we're supposed to be arguing
> > about.  We agree that the Berg murder was violent, reprehensible and
> > wrong, and that the occupation itself was wrong to begin with.   You
> > seem to want to tar me with the "pro-terrorist" brush but I reject
> > that.  I'm just pointing out that one man's terrorist is another man's
> > freedom fighter.    I don't think Berg's killing was justified on any
> > grounds.   I can understand it, however, in a larger context and
> > recognize that the normal rules of "humanity" are out the window in
> > this situation.
> >
> > I can confidently say that, if a foreign army bombed my house and
> > killed my children tonight, I'd be putting on a hood tomorrow morning
> > and terrorizing the occupying army any way I could.  That includes
> > actions that would otherwise considered murder, I suppose -- I could
> > not see myself feeling much sympathy at that point for foreign
> > contractors wandering around trying to fix my phone, etc.   I'd see my
> > actions as justifed by the larger crime commited by the occupying
> > force.
> >
> > But that's just me, I guess.
> >
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 04:25:54 +0000, KAREN ALLEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Despite your claim that ** I'm not defending the actions of Berg's
> >> captors
> >> in any way...**,  your choice of words and comparisons reveal the
> >> opposite.
> >> I have never disputed the fact that war is horrific, however, as I
> >> said,
> >> some things go beyond all sense of humanity.
> >>
> >>> how does anyone justify the deliberate, conscious decision  to cut
> >>> someone's head off?
> >>> I don't know, you tell me.   Does simply taking a picture of the
> >>> dead body
> >>> make a difference in >this argument?
> >>
> >> Actually the body wasn't dead when they began filming.  But somehow,
> >> they
> >> seemed to know how it was going to turn out.
> >>
> >>> One photograph of a mutilated body was taken for the purposes of
> >>> documenting the evils of war  >and the events that took place at
> >>> American
> >>> hands. The other photograph was taken, in my opinion, >to shock the
> >>> occupying army (and it's civilians at home) into stopping their
> >>> aggression.
> >>> Which purpose is more noble?  Can a comparison be made?
> >>
> >> Absolutely.  No one ever accused the photographers present at the
> >> liberation
> >> of the Nazi concentration camps of causing the atrocities they
> >> documented.
> >> No one ever accused Abraham Zapruder of causing President Kennedy's
> >> assassination just so he could take a motion picture of it.
> >> Similarly, no
> >> one is  accusing  the photographers of Iraqi war dead in the example
> >> you
> >> cited as causing the deaths being documented.  The same cannot be
> >> said of
> >> your **noble** individuals who photographed themselves in the act of
> >> butchering Mr. Berg.
> >>
> >> What those individuals did was evil.  The fact that I believe that
> >> what
> >> George Bush is doing in Iraq is wrong will never make me believe that
> >> what
> >> those men did was right.
> >> Karen Allen
> >>
> >>
> > ----
> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
> >
> 
> ----
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
> list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
> <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
>
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to