As I said in my previous email, UCHS asked the City's Historical Commission - I asked, as president - if the SPRUCE HILL LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT we'd been working on since 1987 COULD BE EXPANDED to include all of the area in the National Register District. They said no; that was too large for them to process as one district. So UCHS had no choice but to CONTINE - not shrink, but CONTINUE - with the size set back in 1987 - 17 years ago, Ray.
You were on the board of UCHS through part of this process; I find it hard to believe you aren't more aware of the facts.
why are you yelling? nothing you're saying here corrects anything I've said, and nothing you've said about what happened 17 years ago changes what happened subsequently.
in 1998, mike hardy announces that penn has invited uchs and shca to assist with the planning for the new penn-assisted school
in september 2000, barry grossbach and shca leave the uccc in support of the penn-assisted catchment boundaries
in november 2001 mike hardy announces the boundaries of the nominated spruce hill historic district, saying that it's "only a portion of" the streetcar district and adding that it does not include powelton or garden court (which had already been waiting on the national register since 1984, fourteen years prior to the streetcar district's placement)
today, the penn-assisted catchment area and the nominated spruce hill historic district coincide rather neatly
......... laserbeam [aka ray]
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
