I think you are missing the point -- there is no dispute that SOMETHING struck the Pentagon -- the damage is self-evident.� The controversy (if you can even call it that)�is whether it was a 757 as reported, or something else -- a smaller commuter-type plane for example, or a missile.
What the folks who claim it wasn't a 7xx plane omit is that your normal "portable" missile (air-to-air, air-to-ground, ground-to-ground, ground-to-air) could do nowhere near the kind of damage seen. And a small commuter-type plane would likely bounce off that type of building... they simply do not have sufficient mass, no matter what their velocity, to penetrate as far as the debunkers agree occurred.
That kind of damage is strictly in the range of something like a cruise missile... not an object which people would be likely to miss or mistake for a plane. After all they've been seen regularly on CNN, are slow-moving, and fly at about 200 feet above the average terrain.
T.T.F.N. William H. Magill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
