Good point Jon. Hope Mr. McGill read the inquirer article.
Gee Bush did not "flip flop" on Homeland Security, the 911 commission,
and being a "uniter not a divider. Bush is a very good politician much
better then Kerry. I say this cause a Democrat could not win 5 states
with Bush's record
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Oct 25, 2004 1:44 PM
To: "'William H. Magill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
'University City List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [UC] Clothes make the Man
"Government pay for health insurance"-- wait a second, don't we already have
something like that called Medicare?
Jonathan A. Cass
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William H. Magill
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:00 PM
To: University City List
Subject: Re: [UC] Clothes make the Man
On 22 Oct, 2004, at 14:29, Brian Siano wrote:
> Driving home, I rip off my Bush-Cheney shirt so I can walk the streets
> of my neighborhood unjeered at and without terrifying little children.
> Reflecting on the sting of being called "asshole" during my travels
> through Blue America, I wonder: If I were truly a Bush supporter, how
> long would I be able to endure a life filled with epithets before I
> gave up on the shirt? Changing into a nonpartisan brown Gap polo, I
> breathe a sigh of relief that I will never have to find out.
> Richard Rushfield is a Los Angeles based journalist. He edits the LA
> Innuendo, a satirical review of local culture and co-authors the
> "Intelligence Report" for Vanity Fair.
>
> Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/2108561/
The article is quite informative and only goes to support what many
Politically Incorrect have pointed out -- the hate, animosity and lack
of civility in this election comes from Terry McAuliffe / Howard Dean
side of the fence.
If you want an interesting comparison of the Candidates, examine John
Kerry the candidate in the Spring and compare him to John Kerry the
candidate in the Fall... very different people, very different
positions. You can see a clear change in the Candidate pre and post
Convention. It truly makes one wonder what John Kerry really stands
for.
One is forced to wonder what a post-victory Kerry Administration will
be like?
Will Kerry still wear his Camo and tote his shotgun or will he seek to
register gun owners and ban saturday night specials?
Once Kerry gets government to pay for health insurance, will he ever do
anything to control the actual cost of health care? [Government health
insurance is simply a blank check for the health care industry. They
will be able to charge whatever they want because "insurance" will pay
for anything.] Or will he actually control the real costs by
nationalizing the health care industry and pay doctors, nurses and
others a flat government salary?
If you make less than $100,000 a year, Kerry will cut your taxes -- but
if you make more than $100,000 a year he will increase them ... or will
he? He wants to return "the Clinton Surplus" AND dramatically increase
government spending; the money has to come from somewhere, and there
aren't enough billionaires around anymore since the Clinton bubble
burst?
Kerry is going to eliminate "outsourcing," and replace them with "good
paying" American jobs. Consider the "unintended consequences":
If you consider that an Indian IT worker gets paid (much) less than
$5,000 per year, (the average annual income for an Indian is $450
according to this week's Economist) and you replace them with a US
worker being paid the $75,000 - $100,000 they were paid in the US, how
much will prices rise?
What's that going to do to Walmart -- the largest employer in the
United States (as well as in Pennsylvania)? 80% of the goods sold at
Walmart are imported, mostly from China. Similar numbers apply to
manufacturing wages between China and the US. If Walmart starts "buying
American" how much will their prices increase? 50% 100%?
If prices increase that much that rapidly, what's the inflation rate
going to be? 10%, 20%? higher? What's that going to do to the "housing
bubble" everyone is yamming about? What happens to the Mortgage market
when the Fed increases interest rates to 4% or 5% let alone higher
attempting to subdue the rapid rise in inflation.
Kerry plans to have a 10 year energy development program. Does that
mean that, like France, we will have 90% of our electricity generated
by Nuclear power plants in 10 years? Starting on January 21st that is
the only technology available capable of generating equivalent amounts
electrical power to replace existing coal, oil and natural gas fired
generating plants within 10 years. [Completely ignoring cost issues
here] Photovoltaic technology is, in the laboratory, less than 20%
efficient, but only about 15% efficient in products which can be
manufactured outside the laboratory. Wind power? Then you have the
problem which Massachusetts and Connecticut have today -- instead of
oil wells polluting their costal views, they are fighting windmill
farms -- and no one believes there is any possibility of generating
sufficient and reliable amounts of wind generated electricity with
today's technology.
And we won't even bring up the question of who will pay the bills or
provide the goods and services after the Class Action law suits put all
the evil corporations out of business.
T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
