I don't know why they removed the one at 42nd and Spruce, but they may replace it yet. 
 For some reason, you can't replace the tree right away, you have to wait until 
spring.  For the record, even though I was basically arguing with a guy at the 
Fairmount Park tree dept. over my tree, he WAS very amenable to the idea of replacing 
it and offered to do so next year.  That just wasn't the answer I wanted to hear at 
this point. 
 
 
 
On a related topic, my mom in L.A. just sent me this:
___
I just saw an article on "California Gold" (KCET) about a Santa Monica city worker who 
used to 
inspect sidewalks for tree damage; faced with cutting down 26 trees, he had 
a dream of rubber flexible sidewalks.  It ultimately led to the development 
of rubber sidewalks which have been tested for 5 years; Santa Monica is now 
the first city to use the modular sidewalks made from recycled tires when 
they replace their sidewalks instead of cutting down 
trees.  (www.rubbersidewalks.com)

 
 
 
* * * *


it's a shame when a large mature tree is taken down. does
anyone know why the big ol' royal paulownia on the nw corner
of 42nd and spruce was removed? I recently noticed it was
gone, hadn't realized it was unhealthy or problematic -- it
bloomed magnificently just this spring. now there's only two
remaining paulownias on that block (one at each end, when
there used to be two at each end). nothing was planted in
the place of the removed paulownia ...

.........
laserbeamÂ
[aka ray]





















______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to