If he was the first-born son of the Bush Dynasty AND the namesake of his father, George H.W Bush why did G.H.W. Bush pass over him and Jeb and elevated the last son Neil Bush?
Neil was apparently the best choice. However, he got involved in the Savings and Loan debacle during his father’s Presidency which we are STILL paying for.
Jeb was touted out next but was not to be Heir apparent like Neil.
Finally, George E.was made Governor of Texas in 1994! He was elected (or so some say) President in 2000.
Why wasn’t he first as he should have been as the first-born son and his father’s namesake?
On 11/2/04 2:05 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 11/2/2004 12:22:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was more a function of where your parents spent their money to house you away from home for four years. Believe it or not there are people in this country who truly believe the opposite is true.
Actually, I though us Dems just smoked a lot of pot and did hallucinogens. It was the Republican frat-boy types that drank a lot and snorted a ton of blow.
I hear, he was so F'ed up, he had no recollection of what he did. Maybe that explains the missing years in the TX ANG.
I mean, that's what W did, right?
