Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendations to be discussed

[BGAndersen]

No vote was taken on the proposal to creat a dog committee. There was a motion passed to encourage all dog owners to properly license and leash their dogs.




In a message dated 12/6/04 10:37:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Hello
What was the vote on dogs?
Thanks
Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Dec 6, 2004 5:39 PM
To: Brian Siano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: University City List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] FOCP board meeting -- dog committee recommendations to be discussed

while i don't have an opinion on board members recursing themselves, i
do think everyone has an interest, whether you have a child, dog, cat,
squirrel, goldfish, etc.� it's a community park and we all should have a
say in how it's used.

> I also think that personal attacks are unjustified. Personal comments
made about board members are not fair, nor justified.

i agree with bruce.� it would be great if we could keep this discussion
from becoming personal, as seems to be the case for many discussions in
the hood.� at the end of the day we're still all neighbors.� if we can't
work out these local issues amongst ourselves without personal attacks,
how can we ever expect our country to work out issues in a reasonable way.

hopefully mr roger's hood can be in disagreement without disenfranchisement,
stephen



Brian Siano wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Frank-
>>
>> I haven't done a tally of the FOCP Board members to see what their
>> individual opinions on the issue of a dog park are. However, if you
>> don't think it's fair, I suggest you come to tonight's meeting and
>> ask biased members of the board to recuse themselves.
>>�
>>
> By that yardstick, no one with any interest in the matter should be
> involved with the actual decision.
>
> Heck, that'd be me. I have no dogs and no kids.
>